ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Pondération par score de propension pour l'évaluation des politiques×Pondération par score de propension (PSP / IPW)×
DomaineInférence causaleInférence causale
FamilleRegression modelRegression model
Année d'origine1983/20031983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
Auteur d'origineRosenbaum & Rubin (1983); extended to policy evaluation by Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (2003)Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
TypeQuasi-experimental causal inferenceCausal inference / reweighting
Source fondatriceHirano, K., Imbens, G. W., & Ridder, G. (2003). Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score. Econometrica, 71(4), 1161-1189. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
AliasPSW policy evaluation, inverse probability weighting for policy, IPW policy evaluation, policy PSWPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Apparentées66
RésuméPolicy evaluation propensity score weighting applies inverse-probability weighting to observational data to estimate the causal effect of a policy program. By reweighting participants and non-participants so they resemble a target population, it removes selection bias from voluntary or administratively allocated program assignment without requiring randomization.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Policy Evaluation Propensity Score Weighting · Propensity Score Weighting. Consulté le 2026-06-19 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare