Comparer des méthodes

	Évaluation de politiques par pondération par l'inverse de la probabilité	Estimation doublement robuste (AIPW)
Domaine	Inférence causale	Inférence causale
Famille	Regression model	Regression model
Année d'origine	1952 (IPW origin); 2000s (policy evaluation application)	2005
Auteur d'origine	Horvitz & Thompson (1952); extended to causal policy settings by Robins, Hernan & Brumback (2000) and Imbens & Wooldridge (2009)	Robins & Rotnitzky; Bang & Robins
Type	Reweighting estimator for causal policy analysis	Semiparametric causal estimator
Source fondatrice	Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(1), 5-86.	Robins, J. M. & Rotnitzky, A. (1995). Semiparametric Efficiency in Multivariate Regression Models with Missing Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(429), 122-129.
Alias	IPW policy evaluation, propensity-weighted policy analysis, inverse probability of treatment weighting	AIPW, augmented inverse probability weighting, doubly robust estimator, Çift Gürbüz Kestirici (Augmented IPW / AIPW)
Apparentées	6	5
Résumé	Policy evaluation inverse probability weighting (IPW) uses estimated propensity scores to reweight observed units so that the weighted sample mimics a randomised experiment. Each unit is weighted by the inverse of its probability of receiving the policy, creating a pseudo-population in which treatment assignment is independent of observed covariates and the average treatment effect (ATE) can be read off directly.	Doubly Robust Estimation, also called Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW), is a semiparametric method for estimating causal treatment effects that combines an outcome regression model with a propensity (treatment) model. Developed in the work of Robins & Rotnitzky (1995) and Bang & Robins (2005), it stays consistent as long as at least one of the two models is correctly specified.