ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Échantillonnage théorique pilote×Échantillonnage raisonné×
DomaineMéthodologie d'enquêteMéthodologie d'enquête
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine1967 (theoretical sampling origin); compound practice formalized in qualitative methodology literatureFormalized ~1980–1990
Auteur d'origineGlaser & Strauss (theoretical sampling); pilot study concept is longstanding in research methodologyMichael Quinn Patton (systematic articulation); roots in early qualitative inquiry
TypeQualitative sampling strategy with pilot phaseNon-probability sampling strategy
Source fondatriceGlaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803937796
Aliaspilot-phase theoretical sampling, exploratory theoretical sampling, preliminary theoretical samplingjudgmental sampling, selective sampling, criterion-based sampling, purposeful sampling
Apparentées34
RésuméPilot theoretical sampling applies the logic of theoretical sampling — selecting participants based on emerging concepts and theory — within a deliberate pilot or preliminary phase of a study. Rather than committing immediately to a full sampling strategy, the researcher conducts a small initial round of data collection and analysis to test whether theoretical sampling is feasible, to refine the sensitizing concepts guiding participant selection, and to identify whether the field is productive before full-scale data collection begins.Purposive sampling is a non-probability strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects participants, documents, or cases that are information-rich with respect to the research question. Rather than drawing units at random, the researcher applies explicit criteria aligned with the study's purpose, maximising the depth and relevance of the data collected. It is the default sampling logic in most qualitative research designs and is also used in mixed-methods and applied evaluative work.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Pilot Theoretical Sampling · Purposive sampling. Consulté le 2026-06-17 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare