ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Évaluation participative de programme×Recherche-action×Évaluation de programme×
DomaineMéthodes de terrainRecherche qualitativeMéthodes de terrain
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine1992 (formal articulation); roots in participatory action research of the 1970s–1980s19461960s–1970s (Scriven 1967; Stufflebeam CIPP model 1971)
Auteur d'origineJ. Bradley Cousins & Lorna Earl (formalization); Michael Q. Patton (utilization-focused lineage)Kurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & BradburyMichael Scriven; Daniel Stufflebeam; Peter Rossi
TypeApplied evaluation approachMethodApplied evaluation methodology
Source fondatriceCousins, J. B., & Earl, L. M. (1992). The case for participatory evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(4), 397–418. DOI ↗Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761908944
Aliasparticipatory evaluation, collaborative evaluation, PE, stakeholder-involved evaluationParticipatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative Inquiryevaluation research, program assessment, educational evaluation, systematic program evaluation
Apparentées313
RésuméParticipatory program evaluation is an applied evaluation approach in which program stakeholders — staff, participants, funders, or community members — are actively involved as co-evaluators rather than passive subjects. By engaging those closest to the program in designing questions, collecting data, and interpreting findings, the approach aims to increase both the quality of the evaluation and the likelihood that findings will be understood, owned, and acted upon.Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement.Program evaluation is a systematic, empirically grounded process of collecting and analyzing information about a program to determine its merit, worth, or significance. Applied across education, public health, social services, and policy, it addresses questions such as whether a program is reaching its target population, whether it is being implemented as designed, and whether it is producing the intended outcomes. It draws on both quantitative and qualitative methods and serves accountability, improvement, or knowledge-generation purposes.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Participatory Program Evaluation · Action Research · Program Evaluation. Consulté le 2026-06-17 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare