Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Étude de cas multiples participative× | Recherche-action participative (RAP)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Qualitatif | Qualitatif |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1980s–1990s (convergence of case study methodology and participatory research traditions) | 1940s (Lewin); PAR as distinct tradition formalised ~1970s–1980s |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Robert K. Yin (multiple case study logic); Kurt Lewin and subsequent PAR scholars (participatory framework) | Kurt Lewin (action research foundations, 1940s); systematised for participatory contexts by Orlando Fals Borda, Paulo Freire, and William Foote Whyte |
| Type≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative research method |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 | Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Springer. link ↗ |
| Alias | participatory multi-case study, collaborative multiple case study, PMCS, participatory comparative case research | PAR, community-based participatory research, collaborative action research, participatory inquiry |
| Apparentées≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Résumé≠ | Participatory multiple case study research integrates the structured logic of multiple case study design — examining two or more bounded cases to build analytic generalisations — with the collaborative ethics of participatory research, where community members or practitioners co-design the inquiry, co-collect data, and co-interpret findings. The approach combines Yin's replication logic across cases with the emancipatory and co-ownership principles that define participatory action research traditions. | Participatory Action Research (PAR) is a qualitative, community-centred methodology in which researchers and community members collaborate as co-investigators to identify a shared problem, take deliberate action, observe outcomes, and reflect critically on results — cycling iteratively until meaningful change is achieved. Unlike conventional research that studies people from the outside, PAR treats participants as active agents who co-own the research process, the knowledge produced, and the practical interventions that follow. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|