Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Article de recherche original× | Méta-analyse× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Rédaction académique | Rédaction académique |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1665 | 1976 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Scientific research community | Glass (1976, term coining); Fisher and Pearson (statistical foundations) |
| Type | Document Type | Document Type |
| Source fondatrice≠ | International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2023). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. ICMJE. link ↗ | Page, M. J., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | research paper, empirical article, primary research, journal article | quantitative synthesis, meta-synthesis, pooled analysis, statistical integration |
| Apparentées≠ | 5 | 2 |
| Résumé≠ | An original research article is the primary vehicle for reporting new empirical findings in a discipline. Following the IMRaD structure (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion), it represents a researcher's novel data, analysis, and interpretation. The journal article format has been the gold standard for scientific communication since the establishment of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society in 1665. | Meta-analysis is the statistical pooling of quantitative findings from multiple independent studies to produce a combined effect estimate. By aggregating data across studies, meta-analysis increases statistical power, reduces random error, and provides a precise summary of an intervention's effectiveness or an association's magnitude. Gene V. Glass coined the term in 1976, formalizing a technique that has become indispensable for evidence synthesis in medicine, psychology, education, and other evidence-based disciplines. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|