Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Développement d'échelles ordinales× | Analyse factorielle confirmatoire ordinale× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Psychométrie | Psychométrie |
| Famille | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1932 (Likert format); 1990s–2000s (ordinal-specific psychometric methods) | 1984 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Rensis Likert (foundational ordinal response format); modern ordinal methodology codified by DeVellis and Finney & DiStefano | Bengt O. Muthén |
| Type≠ | Scale construction methodology | Latent variable / structural |
| Source fondatrice≠ | DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale Development: Theory and Applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1506341569 | Flora, D. B. & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 466–491. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | Likert scale development, ordinal measurement scale construction, ordinal item development, polytomous scale construction | CFA for ordinal data, polychoric CFA, WLSMV CFA, categorical CFA |
| Apparentées | 5 | 5 |
| Résumé≠ | Ordinal scale development is the systematic construction and validation of multi-item measurement instruments whose response options form an ordered but not necessarily equal-interval sequence — most commonly Likert-type formats (e.g., 1 = Strongly Disagree to 5 = Strongly Agree). It applies psychometric techniques that respect the ordinal nature of items rather than treating them as continuous. | Ordinal confirmatory factor analysis (Ordinal CFA) tests a pre-specified factor structure when the observed indicators are ordinal — typically Likert-type survey items. By using polychoric correlations and robust estimators such as WLSMV, it avoids the bias that arises from treating categorical responses as continuous. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|