Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Test d'invariance de mesure ordinale× | Analyse factorielle confirmatoire multi-groupes (AFC-MG)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Psychométrie | Psychométrie |
| Famille | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1984–2011 | 1971 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Roger Millsap; Bengt Muthén | Karl Jöreskog |
| Type≠ | Multi-group model comparison | Measurement model / invariance test |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Millsap, R. E. (2011). Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance. Routledge. ISBN: 978-1848728936 | Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | ordinal MI, measurement invariance for ordinal data, ordinal CFA invariance, categorical measurement invariance | MG-CFA, multi-group CFA, measurement invariance testing, multi-sample CFA |
| Apparentées | 6 | 6 |
| Résumé≠ | Ordinal measurement invariance testing evaluates whether a multi-group confirmatory factor model holds equivalent measurement properties across groups when scale items are ordinal — such as Likert-type response scales. It uses polychoric correlations and categorical estimators (WLSMV/DWLS) rather than Pearson-based methods, correcting the systematic bias that arises when ordinal data are treated as continuous. | Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis tests whether a measurement model holds equivalently across two or more groups — such as cultures, genders, or time points. By imposing increasingly stringent equality constraints and comparing model fit, it determines whether comparisons of latent mean scores are justified. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|