Comparer des méthodes

	Échelle Newcastle-Ottawa d'évaluation de la qualité des études observationnelles	PRISMA Checklist
Domaine	Méthodologie de la recherche	Méthodologie de la recherche
Famille	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Année d'origine	2000	2021 (original 2009)
Auteur d'origine	Wells et al. (Ottawa Hospital Research Institute)	Page et al. (PRISMA Group)
Type	Research team assessment	Systematic review author reporting checklist
Source fondatrice	Wells, G. A., Shea, B., O'Connell, D., Peterson, J., Welch, V., Losos, M., & Tugwell, P. (2000). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Retrieved from Ottawa Hospital Research Institute.	Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.
Alias	NOS	PRISMA, PRISMA 2020
Apparentées	4	4
Résumé	The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) is a widely used tool for assessing the methodological quality of observational studies (case-control and cohort designs) included in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Developed by Wells et al. at Ottawa Hospital in 2000, it provides explicit criteria and a star-based scoring system that enables transparent, quantitative comparison of study quality across evidence syntheses.	PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is a 27-item evidence-based checklist published in 2021 (updated from 2009) to standardize reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Endorsed by over 500 journals, PRISMA is the international standard for evidence synthesis reporting, used across healthcare, psychology, education, and social sciences to ensure transparency and reproducibility.