Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Échelle Newcastle-Ottawa d'évaluation de la qualité des études observationnelles× | Cochrane RoB 2.0× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Méthodologie de la recherche | Méthodologie de la recherche |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 2000 | 2019 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Wells et al. (Ottawa Hospital Research Institute) | Jonathan Sterne, Julian Higgins (Cochrane Collaboration) |
| Type≠ | Research team assessment | Clinician-rated / Research team assessment |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Wells, G. A., Shea, B., O'Connell, D., Peterson, J., Welch, V., Losos, M., & Tugwell, P. (2000). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Retrieved from Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. link ↗ | Sterne, J. A., Savović, J., Page, M. J., Elbers, R. G., Blencowe, N. S., Boutron, I., ... & Higgins, J. P. (2019). RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 366, l4898. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | NOS | RoB 2.0, RoB 2 |
| Apparentées | 4 | 4 |
| Résumé≠ | The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) is a widely used tool for assessing the methodological quality of observational studies (case-control and cohort designs) included in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Developed by Wells et al. at Ottawa Hospital in 2000, it provides explicit criteria and a star-based scoring system that enables transparent, quantitative comparison of study quality across evidence syntheses. | RoB 2 is the Cochrane Collaboration's updated methodology for assessing the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Published in 2019, it replaced the original Cochrane RoB tool with a more structured, transparent approach using signalling questions and domain-based judgments to evaluate five critical sources of bias. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|