Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Ethnographie multi-cas× | Théorie ancrée× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine≠ | Qualitatif | Recherche qualitative |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1967 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Robert E. Stake (multiple case study logic); George E. Marcus (multi-sited ethnography) | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss |
| Type≠ | Qualitative comparative research design | Method |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple Case Study Analysis. Guilford Press. ISBN: 978-1593852481 | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗ |
| Alias≠ | multi-site ethnography, comparative ethnography, multi-case ethnographic design, cross-case ethnography | GT, Grounded Theory Approach |
| Apparentées≠ | 5 | 3 |
| Résumé≠ | Multiple case-based ethnography is a qualitative research design that applies sustained ethnographic fieldwork across two or more purposefully selected cases or sites and then compares the resulting thick descriptions to identify patterns, contrasts, and theoretical insights that would be invisible in a single-site study. It combines the contextual depth of ethnography with the comparative logic of multiple case study analysis. | Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|