Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Validité convergente multiniveaux× | Analyse Factorielle Confirmatoire (AFC)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Psychométrie | Psychométrie |
| Famille | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Année d'origine≠ | 2005 | 1969 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Dyer, Hanges & Hall; Chen, Bliese & Mathieu | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| Type≠ | Measurement validity evaluation | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Dyer, N. G., Hanges, P. J. & Hall, R. J. (2005). Applying multilevel confirmatory factor analysis techniques to the study of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 149–167. DOI ↗ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | cross-level convergent validity, multilevel measurement validity, between-level convergent validity | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| Apparentées | 4 | 4 |
| Résumé≠ | Multilevel convergent validity evaluates whether items or scales intended to measure the same construct show coherent, strong associations at each level of a nested data structure — within individuals, within groups, and between groups. It extends classical convergent validity from single-level measurement models into the multilevel confirmatory factor analysis (ML-CFA) framework. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|