ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Analyse de modularité×Centralité d'intermédiarité×
DomaineAnalyse de réseauxAnalyse de réseaux
FamilleMachine learningMachine learning
Année d'origine20041977
Auteur d'origineNewman, M. E. J. & Girvan, M.Freeman, L. C.
TypeCommunity detection / graph partitioningCentrality measure
Source fondatriceNewman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69(2), 026113. DOI ↗Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35–41. DOI ↗
AliasQ-modularity, community structure detection, network modularity optimization, graph partitioning by modularityFreeman betweenness, BC, geodesic betweenness, shortest-path betweenness
Apparentées56
RésuméModularity analysis is a network science method, formalized by Newman and Girvan in 2004, that detects community structure in graphs by measuring whether edges are more concentrated within groups than expected by chance. Its scalar quality index Q guides algorithms that partition nodes into cohesive clusters, making it the most widely adopted framework for community detection in social, biological, and technological networks.Betweenness centrality, formalized by Linton C. Freeman in 1977, measures how often a node lies on the shortest path connecting every other pair of nodes in a network. High-betweenness nodes act as bridges or brokers: removing them fragments the network into disconnected components more severely than removing any other nodes.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Modularity Analysis · Betweenness Centrality. Consulté le 2026-06-15 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare