Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Coefficient de corrélation de Matthews× | Rappel (Sensibilité)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Évaluation de modèles | Évaluation de modèles |
| Famille | MCDM | MCDM |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1975 | 20th century |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Brian W. Matthews | Historical statistical foundations |
| Type | Evaluation metric | Evaluation metric |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Matthews, B. W. (1975). Comparison of predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Protein Structure, 405(2), 442-451. DOI ↗ | Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | Phi Coefficient, Binary Classification Correlation | Sensitivity, True Positive Rate, TPR |
| Apparentées | 5 | 5 |
| Résumé≠ | The Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) is a correlation measure between predicted and actual binary classifications. It ranges from -1 to 1 and is considered one of the most reliable single-score metrics for evaluating binary classifiers, especially on imbalanced datasets. | Recall measures the proportion of actual positive cases that were correctly identified by the classifier. It answers the question: 'Of all the cases that were truly positive, how many did we find?' Recall is critical in scenarios where missing positive cases is costly. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|