Comparer des méthodes

	Modèle de Cox proportionnel des dangers	Étude de cohorte appariée
Domaine	Épidémiologie	Épidémiologie
Famille	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Année d'origine	1972 (Cox model); matched extension widely adopted 1970s–1980s	Mid-20th century; propensity-score variant 1983
Auteur d'origine	D. R. Cox (Cox model, 1972); stratification extension for matched designs by subsequent methodologists including D. C. Thomas	Established practice; propensity-score matching formalized by Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983)
Type	Semi-parametric survival regression for matched data	Observational analytic study design
Source fondatrice	Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 34(2), 187–202.	Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641
Alias	stratified Cox regression, conditional Cox model, matched survival analysis, Cox model for matched pairs	matched follow-up study, paired cohort study, propensity-matched cohort, matched prospective study
Apparentées	4	5
Résumé	Matched Cox proportional hazards is a survival analysis method that extends the Cox regression model to appropriately handle data arising from matched study designs — matched cohorts or matched case-control studies with time-to-event outcomes. By stratifying the partial likelihood by matched set, the method eliminates confounding from matching factors without estimating their baseline hazard, yielding valid hazard ratio estimates that are free from matching-induced bias.	A matched cohort study is an observational design in which each exposed participant is paired with one or more unexposed counterparts who share key characteristics — such as age, sex, or comorbidity status — before both groups are followed forward in time to compare incident outcomes. Matching controls for measured confounders at the design stage, reducing bias that would otherwise require statistical adjustment alone.