Comparer des méthodes

	Validité Nomologique Longitudinale	Validité nomologique
Domaine	Psychométrie	Psychométrie
Famille	Latent structure	Latent structure
Année d'origine	1955 (concept); longitudinal extension 1990s–2000s	1955
Auteur d'origine	Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept, 1955); longitudinal extension developed in organizational and personality research from the 1990s onward	Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
Type	Validity evaluation	Validity evidence framework
Source fondatrice	Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.	Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.
Alias	longitudinal construct validity, nomological network validation across time, longitudinal criterion-related validity, temporal nomological validity	nomological network validity, construct network validity, nomological web validity
Apparentées	6	6
Résumé	Longitudinal nomological validity evaluates whether a construct's theoretically predicted relationships with other constructs hold consistently across multiple measurement occasions. It extends the nomological network framework of Cronbach and Meehl (1955) to longitudinal designs, testing whether a scale behaves as theory demands not only at a single time point but over time.	Nomological validity evaluates whether a construct behaves as theory predicts within a broader network of related constructs. It is not a single statistical test but an accumulation of evidence that the measure fits coherently into a web of theoretically grounded relationships — demonstrating that what is measured is what the theory says it should measure.