Comparer des méthodes

	Validité longitudinale du contenu	Validité de construit
Domaine	Psychométrie	Psychométrie
Famille	Latent structure	Latent structure
Année d'origine	1995–2000	1955
Auteur d'origine	Haynes, Richard & Kubany (1995); extended to longitudinal contexts by measurement invariance researchers	Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
Type	Validity evaluation technique	Validity evaluation framework
Source fondatrice	Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247.	Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.
Alias	longitudinal content validation, temporal content validity, repeated-measure content validity, content validity over time	construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
Apparentées	6	6
Résumé	Longitudinal content validity evaluates whether the items of a measure adequately and consistently represent the intended content domain not only at a single point in time but across repeated administrations. It ensures that the conceptual coverage of a scale remains appropriate and stable as measurement occasions accumulate over a study period.	Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.