Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Conception Hybride en Cercle Composite× | Plan de Box-Behnken× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Plans d'expériences | Plans d'expériences |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1976 | 1960 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | K. G. Roquemore | George E. P. Box and Donald W. Behnken |
| Type≠ | Response surface experimental design | Response surface design (incomplete three-level factorial) |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Roquemore, K. G. (1976). Hybrid designs for quadratic response surfaces. Technometrics, 18(4), 419–423. DOI ↗ | Box, G. E. P., & Behnken, D. W. (1960). Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics, 2(4), 455–475. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | Hybrid CCD, HCCD, modified central composite design, hybrid RSM design | BBD, Box-Behnken, Box-Behnken RSM design, three-level incomplete factorial design |
| Apparentées | 3 | 3 |
| Résumé≠ | Hybrid Central Composite Design (Hybrid CCD) is a class of response surface designs introduced by Roquemore (1976) that combines the structural properties of classical central composite designs with modified or reduced point configurations to achieve rotatability or near-rotatability with fewer experimental runs than a standard CCD, making it especially practical when the number of factors is three to six and experimental resources are limited. | The Box-Behnken design (BBD) is an efficient response surface methodology design that fits a full second-order polynomial model using three levels of each factor. Introduced by Box and Behnken in 1960, it places experimental points at the midpoints of the edges of a hypercube and at the center, avoiding the corner points where all factors are simultaneously at their extreme levels. This structure makes BBD particularly attractive when extreme-level combinations are physically impossible, costly, or unsafe to test. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|