Comparer des méthodes

	Plan de Box-Behnken Hybride	Planification Composite Centrale
Domaine	Plans d'expériences	Plans d'expériences
Famille	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Année d'origine	1960 (standard BBD); hybrid variants developed from 1970s onward	1951
Auteur d'origine	Box & Behnken (1960), extended by various authors for hybrid configurations	George E. P. Box and K. B. Wilson
Type	Response surface experimental design	Response surface experimental design
Source fondatrice	Box, G. E. P., & Behnken, D. W. (1960). Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics, 2(4), 455–475.	Box, G. E. P., & Wilson, K. B. (1951). On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 13(1), 1–45.
Alias	Hybrid BBD, augmented Box-Behnken design, modified Box-Behnken design, extended BBD	CCD, Box-Wilson design, central composite response surface design, rotatable central composite design
Apparentées	4	3
Résumé	The Hybrid Box-Behnken Design (Hybrid BBD) is a three-level response surface design that extends the classical Box-Behnken Design by incorporating additional design points — such as axial, face-centered, or space-filling runs — to improve estimation efficiency, handle larger factor sets, or achieve better predictive coverage. It retains BBD's avoidance of extreme corner runs while gaining the flexibility needed for complex engineering optimization problems.	Central Composite Design (CCD) is a second-order response surface design that allows researchers to efficiently fit a full quadratic model relating multiple continuous input factors to one or more response variables. Introduced by Box and Wilson in 1951, it combines a factorial (or fractional factorial) core, axial (star) points, and center-point replicates into a single unified design, making it the most widely used design for process optimization in engineering, chemistry, and manufacturing.