Comparer des méthodes

	Équilibrage entropique des effets de traitement hétérogènes	Estimation doublement robuste (AIPW)
Domaine	Inférence causale	Inférence causale
Famille	Regression model	Regression model
Année d'origine	2012-2016	2005
Auteur d'origine	Hainmueller (2012) for entropy balancing; Athey & Imbens (2016) for heterogeneous effect estimation	Robins & Rotnitzky; Bang & Robins
Type	Causal inference / heterogeneous effect estimation	Semiparametric causal estimator
Source fondatrice	Hainmueller, J. (2012). Entropy balancing for causal effects: A multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Political Analysis, 20(1), 25-46.	Robins, J. M. & Rotnitzky, A. (1995). Semiparametric Efficiency in Multivariate Regression Models with Missing Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(429), 122-129.
Alias	HTE entropy balancing, CATE with entropy balancing, heterogeneous effects EB, subgroup entropy balancing	AIPW, augmented inverse probability weighting, doubly robust estimator, Çift Gürbüz Kestirici (Augmented IPW / AIPW)
Apparentées	5	5
Résumé	Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Entropy Balancing combines entropy balancing — a preprocessing step that reweights control units to match the treatment group on covariate moments — with methods that estimate how the treatment effect varies across subgroups or individuals. It produces covariate-balanced weights without parametric propensity models, then uses those weights to estimate conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) across moderating variables.	Doubly Robust Estimation, also called Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW), is a semiparametric method for estimating causal treatment effects that combines an outcome regression model with a propensity (treatment) model. Developed in the work of Robins & Rotnitzky (1995) and Bang & Robins (2005), it stays consistent as long as at least one of the two models is correctly specified.