ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Théorie de la généralisabilité (G-Theory)×Analyse Factorielle Confirmatoire×Alpha de Cronbach (Analyse de fiabilité)×Fiabilité inter-juges (κ de Cohen et CCI)×
DomainePsychométriePsychométrieStatistiquePsychométrie
FamilleLatent structureLatent structureLatent structureLatent structure
Année d'origine1963196919511960 (kappa); 1979 (ICC)
Auteur d'origineLee J. Cronbach and colleaguesKarl JöreskogLee J. CronbachCohen (kappa, 1960); Shrout & Fleiss (ICC, 1979)
TypeANOVA-based variance-component frameworkMeasurement model / latent variable analysisReliability / internal consistency coefficientReliability / agreement analysis
Source fondatriceBrennan, R. L. (2001). Generalizability Theory. Springer. link ↗Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research (2nd ed.). Guilford Press. ISBN: 978-1462515363Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. DOI ↗Cohen, J. (1960). A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. DOI ↗
AliasGeneralizability Theory, G-Study / D-Study framework, Genellenebilirlik Kuramı (G-Kuramı)Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi — Ölçek Doğrulama (CFA), confirmatory factor analysis, measurement model testingcoefficient alpha, alpha reliability, internal consistency reliability, Güvenilirlik Analizi (Cronbach Alpha)inter-rater reliability, interrater agreement, rater agreement, Değerlendiriciler Arası Güvenilirlik (Cohen's κ, ICC)
Apparentées6646
RésuméGeneralizability Theory, developed by Lee J. Cronbach and colleagues in the 1960s and formalised by Brennan (2001), is an ANOVA-based framework that extends Classical Test Theory by decomposing observed score variance into multiple, separately identified sources of measurement error — such as raters, tasks, occasions, or items — rather than bundling all error into a single undifferentiated term.Confirmatory factor analysis is a measurement modelling technique that tests whether a hypothesised factor structure — typically derived from theory or an earlier exploratory analysis — fits observed data from a new sample. Developed by Karl Jöreskog in 1969, it became the dominant tool for validating psychological scales because it requires the researcher to specify in advance which items belong to which latent factor and then assesses the adequacy of that specification against explicit statistical fit criteria.Cronbach's alpha is a coefficient of internal consistency that quantifies the degree to which a set of items on a scale measures the same underlying construct. Introduced by Lee J. Cronbach in 1951, it remains the most widely reported reliability index in social-science, health, and educational research.Interrater reliability quantifies the degree to which two or more independent raters produce consistent scores when evaluating the same individuals or products. The family encompasses Cohen's kappa, introduced in 1960 for categorical judgments, and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for continuous ratings, together spanning most measurement scenarios encountered in behavioral, health, and educational research.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: G-Theory · CFA — Scale Validation · Cronbach's Alpha · Interrater Reliability. Consulté le 2026-06-20 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare