ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Méthodologie des groupes de discussion×Méthodes de synthèse des données qualitatives×
DomaineRecherche qualitativeRecherche qualitative
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine19561988
Auteur d'origineRobert K. Merton and Paul F. LazarsfeldGeorge Noblit and Dwight Hare
TypeMethodMethod
Source fondatriceKrueger, R. A. (1994). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803954366Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803931725
AliasFGD, focus group discussion, group interviewqualitative meta-synthesis, meta-ethnography, thematic synthesis, systematic review of qualitative studies
Apparentées44
RésuméFocus group discussions are a qualitative research method in which a trained moderator guides a small group (typically 6–12 participants) through structured or semi-structured discussion of a specific topic or product. Developed by Merton and Lazarsfeld in the 1950s for market research, focus groups are now widely used in health sciences, education, social sciences, and policy research. The method leverages group interaction to generate rich, contextual insights that individual interviews may not reveal.Qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) is a systematic method for combining and interpreting findings from multiple qualitative research studies to generate higher-level understanding and theory. Different approaches—meta-ethnography, thematic synthesis, meta-narrative review, critical interpretive synthesis—each have distinct philosophical underpinnings and analytical procedures. Introduced by Noblit and Hare (1988) with meta-ethnography, qualitative synthesis has evolved alongside systematic reviews of quantitative research. Unlike quantitative meta-analysis, which pools numerical effect sizes, qualitative synthesis integrates concepts, themes, and interpretations from primary studies, identifying patterns, conflicts, and emergent theory. QES is increasingly used in health research, social sciences, and education to understand complex phenomena, translate research into practice, and identify gaps in evidence.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 4 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Focus Group Methodology · Qualitative Evidence Synthesis Methods. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare