Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Échelle Internationale d'Efficacité face aux Chutes (FES-I)× | L'Échelle de fragilité clinique (CFS)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Sciences infirmières | Sciences infirmières |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine | 2005 | 2005 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Lucy Yardley | Kenneth Rockwood |
| Type≠ | Patient self-report questionnaire | Clinician-rated frailty assessment |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Yardley, L., Beyer, N., Eklund, K., et al. (2005). Development and initial validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). Age Ageing, 34(6), 614-619. DOI ↗ | Rockwood, K., Song, X., MacKnight, C., et al. (2005). A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ, 173(5), 489-495. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | FES-I, International Falls Efficacy Scale, Falls Self-Efficacy | CFS, Frailty Scale, Clinical Frailty Assessment |
| Apparentées | 3 | 3 |
| Résumé≠ | The Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), developed by Lucy Yardley and colleagues in 2005, is a validated tool measuring fear of falling and confidence in balance in older adults and others at risk of falls. The 16-item scale assesses how confident a person feels performing daily activities without falling (self-efficacy for fall avoidance). Fear of falling is not anxiety disorder but a rational concern that, if excessive, can lead to activity restriction, deconditioning, and further fall risk. The FES-I is used internationally in clinical practice and research to identify patients at risk for this vicious cycle and guide fall prevention interventions. | The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), developed by Kenneth Rockwood and colleagues in 2005, is a brief, validated tool for assessing frailty in older adults. Frailty—a syndrome of diminished physiologic reserve, increased vulnerability, and reduced functional ability—is recognized as a distinct clinical state that predicts mortality, disability, and healthcare utilization independent of age and comorbidities. The CFS uses a seven-point (or nine-point in later versions) clinical judgment-based scale, making it practical and rapid for bedside use in hospitals, clinics, and long-term care. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|