Comparer des méthodes

	Évaluation de programme basée sur des documents	Évaluation de programme
Domaine	Méthodes de terrain	Méthodes de terrain
Famille	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Année d'origine	1960s–1970s (program evaluation field); document review as formal strategy codified in 1980s–1990s	1960s–1970s (Scriven 1967; Stufflebeam CIPP model 1971)
Auteur d'origine	Daniel Stufflebeam; Peter Rossi and Howard Freeman (systematic program evaluation tradition)	Michael Scriven; Daniel Stufflebeam; Peter Rossi
Type	Evaluation research design	Applied evaluation methodology
Source fondatrice	Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787908331	Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761908944
Alias	documentary program evaluation, records-based evaluation, document review evaluation, archival program evaluation	evaluation research, program assessment, educational evaluation, systematic program evaluation
Apparentées	6	3
Résumé	Document-based program evaluation is a systematic approach to assessing a program's design, implementation, and outcomes using existing documentary evidence — such as policy statements, implementation reports, budgets, meeting minutes, and program artifacts — rather than primary data collection through interviews or observation. It is particularly suited to retrospective evaluations, accountability reviews, and contexts where direct fieldwork is impractical or infeasible.	Program evaluation is a systematic, empirically grounded process of collecting and analyzing information about a program to determine its merit, worth, or significance. Applied across education, public health, social services, and policy, it addresses questions such as whether a program is reaching its target population, whether it is being implemented as designed, and whether it is producing the intended outcomes. It draws on both quantitative and qualitative methods and serves accountability, improvement, or knowledge-generation purposes.