Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Analyse du discours× | Analyse Thématique× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Recherche qualitative | Recherche qualitative |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) | 2006 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke |
| Type | Method | Method |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis | TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis |
| Apparentées≠ | 2 | 3 |
| Résumé≠ | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. | Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|