Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Analyse du curriculum× | Analyse du discours× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine≠ | Méthodes de terrain | Recherche qualitative |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1949 (Tyler); 1980s–2000s (Posner's analytic framework) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | George J. Posner (systematic framework); Ralph Tyler (foundational rationale) | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| Type≠ | Qualitative / mixed document analysis | Method |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Posner, G. J. (2004). Analyzing the Curriculum (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0072823899 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| Alias≠ | curriculum evaluation, curriculum review, syllabus analysis, curriculum appraisal | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| Apparentées≠ | 6 | 2 |
| Résumé≠ | Curriculum analysis is a systematic research method for examining the content, structure, goals, and underlying assumptions of educational curricula — including written syllabi, textbooks, lesson plans, and policy documents. By mapping what is taught, how it is sequenced, and what values are embedded, researchers and educators can evaluate alignment with learning objectives, identify gaps or biases, and guide curriculum reform across all levels of education. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|