Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Analyse Conversation× | Analyse Thématique× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine≠ | Qualitatif | Recherche qualitative |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | Late 1960s–1974 (foundational lectures 1964–1972; landmark article 1974) | 2006 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke |
| Type≠ | Qualitative research method | Method |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. link ↗ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | CA, talk-in-interaction, sequential analysis, interactional analysis | TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis |
| Apparentées≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Résumé≠ | Conversation Analysis (CA) is a qualitative research method that examines the fine-grained sequential structure of naturally occurring talk and social interaction. Developed by sociologists Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson in the 1960s and 1970s, CA investigates how participants in a conversation accomplish social actions — such as invitations, refusals, or diagnoses — through the precise moment-by-moment organisation of their talk, including turn-taking, sequence structure, repair, and recipient design. | Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|