ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Analyse de contenu×Recherche par groupes de discussion×Technique du groupe nominal×
DomaineQualitatifQualitatifQualitatif
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origineSystematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 20181940s (sociological origin); modern applied form from the 1980s–1990s1971
Auteur d'origineKlaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications researchRobert K. Merton (sociological precursor, 1940s); popularised in applied research by Richard A. KruegerAndré L. Delbecq and Andrew H. Van de Ven
TypeQualitative / mixed-method research techniqueQualitative data collection methodQualitative research method
Source fondatriceKrippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661Krueger, R.A. & Casey, M.A. (2014). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (5th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483365244Delbecq, A. L., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1971). A group process model for problem identification and program planning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7(4), 466–492. link ↗
Aliasİçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysisfocus group discussion, FGD, group interview, Odak Grup AraştırmasıNGT, structured group process, nominal group process, priority-setting group method
Apparentées566
RésuméContent analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material.Focus group research is a qualitative data-collection method in which a trained moderator guides structured discussions with homogeneous groups of six to ten participants to explore ideas, attitudes, and perceptions on a defined topic. Developed from sociological roots in the 1940s and systematised for applied research by Krueger and Casey, the method leverages group interaction as a data source — revealing not just what people think, but how they negotiate and articulate views in a social setting.The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) is a structured group facilitation method designed to generate and prioritise ideas, problems, or solutions while ensuring equal participation from all members. Developed by Delbecq and Van de Ven in 1971, it combines silent individual idea generation with structured group discussion and systematic voting to produce a ranked list of priorities. Unlike unstructured focus groups, NGT prevents dominant voices from suppressing quieter participants, making it especially valuable for needs assessment, program planning, and stakeholder priority-setting in applied research and policy contexts.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Content Analysis · Focus Group · Nominal Group Technique. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare