Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Validité de construit× | Validité discriminante× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Psychométrie | Psychométrie |
| Famille | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1955 | 1959 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl | Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske |
| Type≠ | Validity evaluation framework | Validity evidence / psychometric evaluation |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation | discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity |
| Apparentées≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Résumé≠ | Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test. | Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|