Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Matrice de confusion× | Spécificité× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Évaluation de modèles | Évaluation de modèles |
| Famille | MCDM | MCDM |
| Année d'origine | 20th century | 20th century |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Statistical foundations | Historical statistical foundations |
| Type≠ | Evaluation visualization | Evaluation metric |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Everitt, B. S., & Hothorn, T. (2005). A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using R. Chapman and Hall/CRC. link ↗ | Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | Error Matrix, Contingency Table | True Negative Rate, TNR |
| Apparentées | 5 | 5 |
| Résumé≠ | The confusion matrix is a table that displays the counts of true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives. It provides a complete picture of where a classifier makes correct and incorrect predictions, enabling calculation of all other classification metrics. | Specificity measures the proportion of actual negative cases that were correctly identified as negative by the classifier. It answers the question: 'Of all the cases that were truly negative, how many did we correctly reject?' Specificity is complementary to recall and is essential when false positives are costly. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|