Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Validité convergente pour les tests adaptatifs informatisés× | Validité discriminante× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Psychométrie | Psychométrie |
| Famille | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1989–2000 | 1959 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Samuel Messick (validity framework); Wainer and colleagues (CAT context) | Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske |
| Type≠ | Validity evidence / construct validation | Validity evidence / psychometric evaluation |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Wainer, H. (Ed.). (2000). Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0805835113 | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | CAT convergent validity, adaptive test construct validation, CAT validity evidence, convergent validity in CAT | discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity |
| Apparentées | 5 | 5 |
| Résumé≠ | Convergent validity assessment for computerized adaptive tests (CATs) examines whether the ability or trait estimates produced by an adaptive algorithm correlate substantially with scores from other measures of the same construct. Because each examinee receives a different subset of items in a CAT, demonstrating that the resulting scores still converge with theoretically related external measures is a critical step in establishing construct validity evidence. | Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|