Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| ANOVA Bayésienne à Deux Facteurs× | Test t bayésien× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine≠ | Statistique | Bayésien |
| Famille≠ | Hypothesis test | Bayesian methods |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1961 (foundations); 2012 (default Bayes factor formulation) | 2009 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Harold Jeffreys (foundational); modern default-prior form by Jeffrey N. Rouder et al. | Rouder, Speckman, Sun, Morey & Iverson |
| Type | Bayesian hypothesis test | Bayesian hypothesis test |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Speckman, P. L., & Province, J. M. (2012). Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56(5), 356–374. DOI ↗ | Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D. & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t Tests for Accepting and Rejecting the Null Hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 225–237. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | Bayesian factorial ANOVA, Bayes factor two-way ANOVA, Bayesian 2×k ANOVA, Bayesian two-factor ANOVA | bayesian two-sample t-test, bayes factor t-test, Bayesçi t-Testi |
| Apparentées≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Résumé≠ | Bayesian two-way ANOVA extends the classical two-way analysis of variance by replacing p-values with Bayes factors and posterior distributions. It quantifies evidence for or against main effects and their interaction using prior-weighted model comparison, yielding conclusions that are directly interpretable in probabilistic terms rather than relying on a fixed significance threshold. | The Bayesian t-test, formalised by Rouder and colleagues in 2009, is a two-group comparison method that works within a Bayesian framework. Instead of a p-value, it produces a Bayes Factor (BF₁₀) that quantifies the evidence the data provide for the alternative hypothesis relative to the null, and it reports the full posterior distribution of the standardised effect size δ with a highest-density interval. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|