Comparer des méthodes

	Test bayésien d'invariance de la mesure	Analyse factorielle confirmatoire multi-groupes (AFC-MG)
Domaine	Psychométrie	Psychométrie
Famille	Latent structure	Latent structure
Année d'origine	2013	1971
Auteur d'origine	Bengt Muthen, Tihomir Asparouhov, Rens Van de Schoot	Karl Jöreskog
Type	Bayesian multigroup latent variable test	Measurement model / invariance test
Source fondatrice	Van de Schoot, R., Kluytmans, A., Tummers, L., Lugtig, P., Hox, J., & Muthen, B. (2013). Facing off with Scylla and Charybdis: a comparison of scalar, partial, and the novel possibility of approximate measurement invariance. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 770.	Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70.
Alias	Bayesian MI, approximate measurement invariance, Bayesian multigroup CFA invariance, BSEM measurement invariance	MG-CFA, multi-group CFA, measurement invariance testing, multi-sample CFA
Apparentées	6	6
Résumé	Bayesian measurement invariance testing evaluates whether a scale's factor loadings and item intercepts are equivalent across groups, using a Bayesian framework that allows parameters to deviate from strict equality by a small, probabilistically specified amount rather than imposing an exact constraint.	Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis tests whether a measurement model holds equivalently across two or more groups — such as cultures, genders, or time points. By imposing increasingly stringent equality constraints and comparing model fit, it determines whether comparisons of latent mean scores are justified.