Comparer des méthodes

	Conception bayésienne d'expériences	Méthodologie des surfaces de réponse (RSM)
Domaine	Plans d'expériences	Plans d'expériences
Famille	Process / pipeline	Hypothesis test
Année d'origine	1956 (foundational); formalized 1970s–1990s	1951
Auteur d'origine	Lindley (1956); Chaloner & Verdinelli (1995) landmark review	George E. P. Box & K. B. Wilson
Type	Bayesian optimal experimental design	Second-order polynomial response surface model
Source fondatrice	Chaloner, K., & Verdinelli, I. (1995). Bayesian Experimental Design: A Review. Statistical Science, 10(3), 273–304.	Box, G. E. P. & Wilson, K. B. (1951). On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 13(1), 1–45.
Alias	Bayesian DOE, Bayesian optimal design, Bayesian experimental design, BDE	RSM, Central Composite Design, Box-Behnken Design, CCD
Apparentées	3	7
Résumé	Bayesian design of experiments selects experimental runs by maximising a utility function — typically the expected information gain — computed over prior beliefs about model parameters. Unlike classical design, which optimizes algebraic criteria such as D-optimality under fixed assumptions, Bayesian DOE incorporates prior knowledge and uncertainty about the system, yielding designs that are optimal in expectation across all plausible parameter values.	Response Surface Methodology is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques for building an empirical second-order polynomial model that relates a continuous response variable to two or more controllable input factors, and then locating the factor settings that optimize that response. The approach was introduced by George E. P. Box and K. B. Wilson in their landmark 1951 paper and has since become a cornerstone of process optimization across engineering, chemistry, food science, and pharmaceutics.