Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Indice de Rand Ajusté× | Information Mutuelle Normalisée× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Évaluation de modèles | Évaluation de modèles |
| Famille | MCDM | MCDM |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1985 | 2005 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Lawrence Hubert, Phipps Arabie | Danon, Diaz-Guilera, Duch, Arenas |
| Type≠ | External similarity metric | Information-theoretic metric |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Hubert, L., & Arabie, P. (1985). Comparing partitions. Journal of Classification, 2(1), 193-218. DOI ↗ | Danon, L., Diaz-Guilera, A., Duch, J., & Arenas, A. (2005). Comparing community structure identification. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2005(09), P09008. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | ARI, adjusted Rand coefficient | NMI, mutual information, information criterion |
| Apparentées | 5 | 5 |
| Résumé≠ | The Adjusted Rand Index (ARI), developed by Hubert and Arabie in 1985, is an external clustering evaluation metric that measures the agreement between a predicted clustering and a ground truth labeling. It ranges from -1 to 1, where 1 indicates perfect agreement, 0 indicates random clustering, and negative values indicate performance worse than random chance. | Normalized Mutual Information (NMI), popularized by Danon et al. in 2005, is an external clustering evaluation metric based on information theory. It measures the amount of information shared between a predicted clustering and ground truth labels, normalized to a scale between 0 and 1. A value of 1 indicates perfect agreement, while 0 indicates independence. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|