Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Recherche-action× | Notes de terrain× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine≠ | Recherche qualitative | Méthodologie d'enquête |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1946 | Late 19th century (formalized in 20th century) |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Kurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & Bradbury | Rooted in 19th-century anthropology and sociology; systematized by ethnographers such as Bronislaw Malinowski and later Robert Emerson et al. |
| Type≠ | Method | Qualitative data collection and recording technique |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗ | Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226206813 |
| Alias≠ | Participatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative Inquiry | fieldnotes, observational notes, ethnographic notes, jottings |
| Apparentées≠ | 1 | 6 |
| Résumé≠ | Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement. | Field notes are detailed written records created by researchers during or immediately after direct observation in a naturalistic setting. They capture what is seen, heard, and experienced — including behaviors, interactions, physical environments, and the researcher's own analytic impressions — forming the primary data source for ethnographic and observational studies. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|