Vertaile menetelmiä

	Järjestysprioriteettimenetelmä	Paras-Huonoin -menetelmä	PROMETHEE II
Tieteenala	Päätöksenteko	Päätöksenteko	Päätöksenteko
Menetelmäperhe	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Syntyvuosi	1977	2015	1986
Kehittäjä	Ward Edwards and collaborators	Rezaei, J.	Brans, J. P., Vincke, Ph., Mareschal, B.
Tyyppi	Ordinal ranking-based weight derivation	Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP	Preference function (net flow)
Alkuperäislähde	Edwards, W. (1977). Use of multiattribute utility measurement for social decision making. In D. E. Bell, R. L. Keeney, & H. Raiffa (Eds.), Conflicting objectives in decisions (pp. 247-307). Wiley.	Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega	Brans, J. P., Vincke, Ph., Mareschal, B. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research
Rinnakkaisnimet	OPA, Ordinal Priority	—	—
Liittyvät	4	8	8
Tiivistelmä	The Ordinal Priority Approach (OPA) is a family of methods that derive criteria weights directly from ordinal rankings rather than cardinal (numerical) preferences. Instead of asking decision-makers to assign exact weight values or ratio comparisons, OPA asks only: which criterion is most important, which is second, etc. The method then converts this ordinal ranking into numerical weights using geometric or statistical formulas.	BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	PROMETHEE (PROMETHEE II — Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment of Evaluations) is a outranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Brans, J. P., Vincke, Ph., Mareschal, B. in 1986. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.