Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Järjestysprioriteettimenetelmä× | PROMETHEE II× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Päätöksenteko | Päätöksenteko |
| Menetelmäperhe | MCDM | MCDM |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1977 | 1986 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Ward Edwards and collaborators | Brans, J. P., Vincke, Ph., Mareschal, B. |
| Tyyppi≠ | Ordinal ranking-based weight derivation | Preference function (net flow) |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Edwards, W. (1977). Use of multiattribute utility measurement for social decision making. In D. E. Bell, R. L. Keeney, & H. Raiffa (Eds.), Conflicting objectives in decisions (pp. 247-307). Wiley. link ↗ | Brans, J. P., Vincke, Ph., Mareschal, B. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research DOI ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet≠ | OPA, Ordinal Priority | — |
| Liittyvät≠ | 4 | 8 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | The Ordinal Priority Approach (OPA) is a family of methods that derive criteria weights directly from ordinal rankings rather than cardinal (numerical) preferences. Instead of asking decision-makers to assign exact weight values or ratio comparisons, OPA asks only: which criterion is most important, which is second, etc. The method then converts this ordinal ranking into numerical weights using geometric or statistical formulas. | PROMETHEE (PROMETHEE II — Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment of Evaluations) is a outranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Brans, J. P., Vincke, Ph., Mareschal, B. in 1986. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|