Vertaile menetelmiä

	Instrumentaalimuuttujat koulutustutkimuksessa	Erojen erot (Diff-in-Diff)
Tieteenala	Kausaalipäättely	Ekonometria
Menetelmäperhe	Regression model	Regression model
Syntyvuosi	1991 (canonical education application)	1994
Kehittäjä	Angrist & Krueger (canonical 1991 education application); grounded in IV theory by Wright (1928)	Card & Krueger (canonical 1994 application); Angrist & Pischke (textbook treatment)
Tyyppi	Quasi-experimental causal identification	Causal inference / panel regression
Alkuperäislähde	Angrist, J. D., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Does Compulsory School Attendance Affect Schooling and Earnings? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 979-1014.	Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton University Press. ISBN: 978-0691120355
Rinnakkaisnimet	IV in education, 2SLS in education, education IV, school IV estimation	diff-in-diff, DiD, Farkların Farkı (Diff-in-Diff)
Liittyvät	5	5
Tiivistelmä	Instrumental variables (IV) estimation is a quasi-experimental strategy for isolating the causal effect of schooling or educational interventions when assignment to treatment is confounded by unobserved factors. Pioneered in education economics by Angrist and Krueger's use of quarter-of-birth as an instrument for compulsory schooling, IV finds a source of exogenous variation in exposure to education and uses only that variation to estimate outcomes such as earnings, test scores, or attainment.	Difference-in-Differences is a causal-inference method that estimates the effect of an intervention by comparing how a treatment group and a control group change over time. Made famous by Card and Krueger's 1994 minimum-wage study and developed in Angrist and Pischke's Mostly Harmless Econometrics, it isolates the treatment effect as the difference between the two groups' before-after changes.