Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Äärimmäisten arvojen teoria (EVT)× | Ehdollinen arvo riskissä (Expected Shortfall)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Rahoitus | Rahoitus |
| Menetelmäperhe | Regression model | Regression model |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 2001 | 2000 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Coles (textbook treatment); McNeil, Frey & Embrechts | Rockafellar & Uryasev (2000); Acerbi & Tasche (2002) |
| Tyyppi≠ | Tail / extreme-event model | Coherent tail-risk measure |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Coles, S. (2001). An Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Values. Springer. ISBN: 978-1852334598 | Rockafellar, R. T. & Uryasev, S. (2000). Optimization of Conditional Value-at-Risk. Journal of Risk, 2(3), 21-41. DOI ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | EVT, generalized extreme value, generalized Pareto distribution, peaks over threshold | CVaR, expected shortfall, average value-at-risk, tail VaR |
| Liittyvät | 5 | 5 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | Extreme Value Theory is a statistical framework for modelling the rare events that live in the tail of a probability distribution. As developed in Coles (2001) and applied to risk by McNeil, Frey & Embrechts (2005), it offers two standard routes: the Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) distribution for block maxima and the Generalized Pareto Distribution (GPD), used in the peaks-over-threshold approach, for exceedances above a high threshold. | Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR), also called Expected Shortfall, is a coherent tail-risk measure that quantifies the conditional expectation of losses beyond the Value-at-Risk threshold. It was introduced for optimization by Rockafellar and Uryasev (2000) and shown to be coherent by Acerbi and Tasche (2002), and it has replaced VaR as the regulatory standard under Basel III/IV. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|