ScholarGate
Avustaja

Vertaile menetelmiä

Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.

Value-at-Risk (VaR) -takaisintestaus×GARCH-malli (volatiliteetin ennustaminen)×
TieteenalaRahoitusEkonometria
MenetelmäperheRegression modelRegression model
Syntyvuosi19981986
KehittäjäKupiec (1995); Christoffersen (1998); Engle & Manganelli (DQ test)Tim Bollerslev
TyyppiStatistical hypothesis tests on VaR violation sequencesConditional volatility model
AlkuperäislähdeKupiec, P. H. (1995). Techniques for Verifying the Accuracy of Risk Measurement Models. The Journal of Derivatives, 3(2), 73-84. DOI ↗Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307–327. DOI ↗
RinnakkaisnimetVaR backtest, Kupiec test, Christoffersen test, Dynamic Quantile testGARCH, GARCH(1,1), conditional volatility model, GARCH Modeli (Oynaklık Tahmini)
Liittyvät35
TiivistelmäVaR backtesting is a family of statistical tests that validate a risk model by comparing its Value-at-Risk forecasts against realised losses. It builds on Kupiec's (1995) unconditional coverage test, Christoffersen's (1998) conditional coverage test, and the Engle-Manganelli Dynamic Quantile (DQ) test.The Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH) model, introduced by Tim Bollerslev in 1986, models the time-varying conditional variance of a financial time series. It captures volatility clustering and the ARCH effect, and is the standard tool for estimating risk and volatility in return series.
ScholarGateAineisto
  1. v1
  2. 2 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED

Siirry hakuun Lataa diat

ScholarGateVertaile menetelmiä: VaR Backtesting · GARCH Model. Haettu 2026-06-15 osoitteesta https://scholargate.app/fi/compare