Controversy Mapping
Controversy mapping is a descriptive method for exploring and representing socio-technical disputes while they are still open and unsettled, before they harden into accepted facts or stable technologies. Developed as a teaching practice by Bruno Latour and codified by Tommaso Venturini at the Sciences Po médialab, it asks the analyst to dive into the heat of a debate, follow the actors and their arguments without prematurely taking sides, and render the resulting complexity legible through maps and visualisations. It treats controversy not as a pathology to be resolved but as the privileged moment in which the social and the technical are visibly being assembled.
مطالعهٔ کامل روش
برای خواندن این بخش با حساب رایگان وارد شوید.
نقشهٔ روش
همسایگی روشهای مرتبط — برای کاوش، یک گره را برگزینید.
منابع
- Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258-273. DOI: 10.1177/0963662509102694 ↗
- Venturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796-812. DOI: 10.1177/0963662510387558 ↗
نحوهٔ استناد به این صفحه
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Controversy Mapping (Cartography of Scientific Controversies). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/fa/science-technology-studies/controversy-mapping
کدام روش؟
این روش را در کنار نزدیکترین روشهای خویشاوندش بگذارید و آنها را کنار هم بخوانید — کتابخانه کتابها را روی میز میگشاید؛ انتخاب با شماست.
- Actor-Network Theory AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ مقایسه
- Boundary-Work AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ مقایسه
- Social Construction of TechnologyScience Technology Studies↔ مقایسه
- Sociotechnical Imaginaries AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ مقایسه
ارجاعشده در
روشهای مشابه
در این صفحه مشکلی دیدید؟ گزارش دهید یا اصلاحی پیشنهاد کنید →