مقایسهٔ روشها
روشهای انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیفهای متفاوت برجسته شدهاند.
| نرخ توسعه نیرو× | تخمین حداکثر تکرار اول (1RM)× | |
|---|---|---|
| حوزه | علوم ورزشی | علوم ورزشی |
| خانواده | Hypothesis test | Hypothesis test |
| سال پیدایش≠ | 2002 | 1993 |
| پدیدآور≠ | Peter Aagaard | Matt Brzycki |
| نوع≠ | isometric force measurement | submaximal prediction |
| منبع بنیادین≠ | Aagaard, P., Simonsen, E. B., Andersen, J. L., Magnusson, P., & Dyhre-Poulsen, P. (2002). Increased rate of force development and neural drive of human skeletal muscle following resistance training. Journal of Applied Physiology, 93(3), 1318-1326. DOI ↗ | Brzycki, M. (1993). Strength testing: predicting a one-rep max from reps-to-fatigue. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 64(1), 88-90. link ↗ |
| نامهای دیگر | RFD, explosive strength, force development rate, strength impulse | one-rep max prediction, estimated 1RM, strength prediction, maximal strength assessment |
| مرتبط | 5 | 5 |
| خلاصه≠ | Rate of force development (RFD) is the speed at which force is produced during the initial phase of muscle contraction, typically expressed as the slope of the force-time curve in the first 50, 100, or 200 milliseconds of isometric contraction. Introduced comprehensively by Aagaard and colleagues (2002), RFD is a measure of explosive strength capacity and neural drive efficiency. Unlike maximal voluntary strength (which captures peak force), RFD captures how quickly an athlete can generate that force—a critical quality in sports requiring rapid, explosive movements (sprinting starts, jumping, tackling). RFD improves dramatically with strength training, reflecting increased motor unit recruitment rate and firing frequency. | One-repetition maximum (1RM) estimation is a method to predict an athlete's maximum strength in a given lift without performing an actual maximal single repetition. Developed systematically by Matt Brzycki (1993) and refined by numerous researchers, 1RM estimation uses submaximal loads and repetition performance to extrapolate a strength ceiling. Rather than exposing untrained individuals, older adults, or post-injury athletes to the stress and injury risk of true 1RM testing, estimation provides a safer, time-efficient alternative. Multiple prediction equations exist, with varying accuracy depending on population and lift type. |
| ScholarGateمجموعهداده ↗ |
|
|