ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelineDigital controversy cartography

Web Controversy Analysis

Web controversy analysis studies scientific, technical, and public controversies through the traces they leave online—hyperlink networks, search-engine results, and social-media activity. Building on the controversy-mapping tradition but reworking it as a web-native digital method, it follows Tommaso Venturini's call to 'build on faults' and Noortje Marres's argument for controversy analysis as a digital method, using crawling and co-link analysis to reveal how positions in a dispute are connected, opposed, and arranged across the web.

Ava rakenduses MethodMindPeagiRakenda, võrdle, saa juhiseid
Tööriistad ja ressursid
Laadi slaidid alla
Õpi ja avasta
VideoPeagi

Loe meetodi täielikku kirjeldust

Ainult liikmetele

Selle osa lugemiseks logi sisse tasuta kontoga.

Logi sisse

Meetodikaart

Seotud meetodite ümbruskond — vali sõlm, et seda uurida.

Allikad

  1. Venturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796-812. DOI: 10.1177/0963662510387558
  2. Marres, N. (2015). Why map issues? On controversy analysis as a digital method. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(5), 655-686. DOI: 10.1177/0162243915574602

Kuidas sellele lehele viidata

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Web-Based Controversy Analysis. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/et/science-technology-studies/web-controversy-analysis

Milline meetod?

Aseta see meetod oma lähimate sugulaste kõrvale ja loe neid kõrvuti — raamatukogu laob raamatud lauale; valik on sinu.

Võrdle kõrvuti

Sellele viitavad

ScholarGateWeb Controversy Analysis (Web-Based Controversy Analysis). Loetud 2026-06-24 aadressilt https://scholargate.app/et/science-technology-studies/web-controversy-analysis · Andmestik: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026