ScholarGate
Assistent

Võrdle meetodeid

Vaata valitud meetodeid kõrvuti; erinevad read on esile tõstetud.

Web Controversy Analysis×Controversy Mapping×
ValdkondScience Technology StudiesScience Technology Studies
PerekondProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Tekkeaasta20122010
LoojaTommaso Venturini, Noortje MarresBruno Latour (Sciences Po médialab); codified by Tommaso Venturini
TüüpWeb-native controversy research methodQualitative descriptive method and pedagogy
AlgallikasVenturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796-812. DOI ↗Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258-273. DOI ↗
RööpnimetusedWeb controversy mapping, Hyperlink controversy analysis, Online controversy cartographyCartography of controversies, Mapping scientific controversies, Controversy analysis
Seotud44
KokkuvõteWeb controversy analysis studies scientific, technical, and public controversies through the traces they leave online—hyperlink networks, search-engine results, and social-media activity. Building on the controversy-mapping tradition but reworking it as a web-native digital method, it follows Tommaso Venturini's call to 'build on faults' and Noortje Marres's argument for controversy analysis as a digital method, using crawling and co-link analysis to reveal how positions in a dispute are connected, opposed, and arranged across the web.Controversy mapping is a descriptive method for exploring and representing socio-technical disputes while they are still open and unsettled, before they harden into accepted facts or stable technologies. Developed as a teaching practice by Bruno Latour and codified by Tommaso Venturini at the Sciences Po médialab, it asks the analyst to dive into the heat of a debate, follow the actors and their arguments without prematurely taking sides, and render the resulting complexity legible through maps and visualisations. It treats controversy not as a pathology to be resolved but as the privileged moment in which the social and the technical are visibly being assembled.
ScholarGateAndmestik
  1. v1
  2. 2 Allikad
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Allikad
  3. PUBLISHED

Mine otsingusse Laadi slaidid alla

ScholarGateVõrdle meetodeid: Web Controversy Analysis · Controversy Mapping. Loetud 2026-06-24 aadressilt https://scholargate.app/et/compare