ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelineCartography of controversies

Controversy Mapping

Controversy mapping is a descriptive method for exploring and representing socio-technical disputes while they are still open and unsettled, before they harden into accepted facts or stable technologies. Developed as a teaching practice by Bruno Latour and codified by Tommaso Venturini at the Sciences Po médialab, it asks the analyst to dive into the heat of a debate, follow the actors and their arguments without prematurely taking sides, and render the resulting complexity legible through maps and visualisations. It treats controversy not as a pathology to be resolved but as the privileged moment in which the social and the technical are visibly being assembled.

Ava rakenduses MethodMindPeagiRakenda, võrdle, saa juhiseid
Tööriistad ja ressursid
Laadi slaidid alla
Õpi ja avasta
VideoPeagi

Loe meetodi täielikku kirjeldust

Ainult liikmetele

Selle osa lugemiseks logi sisse tasuta kontoga.

Logi sisse

Meetodikaart

Seotud meetodite ümbruskond — vali sõlm, et seda uurida.

Allikad

  1. Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258-273. DOI: 10.1177/0963662509102694
  2. Venturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796-812. DOI: 10.1177/0963662510387558

Kuidas sellele lehele viidata

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Controversy Mapping (Cartography of Scientific Controversies). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/et/science-technology-studies/controversy-mapping

Milline meetod?

Aseta see meetod oma lähimate sugulaste kõrvale ja loe neid kõrvuti — raamatukogu laob raamatud lauale; valik on sinu.

Võrdle kõrvuti

Sellele viitavad

ScholarGateControversy Mapping (Controversy Mapping (Cartography of Scientific Controversies)). Loetud 2026-06-24 aadressilt https://scholargate.app/et/science-technology-studies/controversy-mapping · Andmestik: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026