Bureaucratic Reputation Analysis
Bureaucratic reputation analysis is an analytical framework for explaining the behaviour, power and autonomy of public agencies through the lens of their reputation — the set of symbolic beliefs about an agency's capacities, intentions and history held by its many audiences. Developed by Daniel Carpenter, notably in his 2001 study of how U.S. executive agencies forged autonomy, and elaborated with George Krause, the framework treats reputation as a strategic asset that agencies cultivate and protect. It distinguishes performative, moral, technical and procedural dimensions of reputation and traces how reputational concerns drive what agencies do.
Loe meetodi täielikku kirjeldust
Selle osa lugemiseks logi sisse tasuta kontoga.
Meetodikaart
Seotud meetodite ümbruskond — vali sõlm, et seda uurida.
Allikad
- Carpenter, D. P. (2001). The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN: 9780691070100
- Carpenter, D. P., & Krause, G. A. (2012). Reputation and Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 26–32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02506.x ↗
Kuidas sellele lehele viidata
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Bureaucratic Reputation Analysis of Public Agencies. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/et/public-administration/bureaucratic-reputation-analysis
Milline meetod?
Aseta see meetod oma lähimate sugulaste kõrvale ja loe neid kõrvuti — raamatukogu laob raamatud lauale; valik on sinu.
- New Public Management AssessmentPublic Administration↔ võrdle
- Regulatory Enforcement AnalysisPublic Administration↔ võrdle
- Transparency IndexPublic Administration↔ võrdle
- Whole-of-Government AnalysisPublic Administration↔ võrdle
Sellele viitavad
Sarnased meetodid
Märkasid sellel lehel viga? Teata sellest või paku parandust →