Web Controversy Analysis
Web controversy analysis studies scientific, technical, and public controversies through the traces they leave online—hyperlink networks, search-engine results, and social-media activity. Building on the controversy-mapping tradition but reworking it as a web-native digital method, it follows Tommaso Venturini's call to 'build on faults' and Noortje Marres's argument for controversy analysis as a digital method, using crawling and co-link analysis to reveal how positions in a dispute are connected, opposed, and arranged across the web.
Leer el método completo
Inicia sesión con una cuenta gratuita para leer esta sección.
Mapa de métodos
El vecindario de métodos relacionados: selecciona un nodo para explorarlo.
Fuentes
- Venturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796-812. DOI: 10.1177/0963662510387558 ↗
- Marres, N. (2015). Why map issues? On controversy analysis as a digital method. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(5), 655-686. DOI: 10.1177/0162243915574602 ↗
Cómo citar esta página
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Web-Based Controversy Analysis. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/es/science-technology-studies/web-controversy-analysis
¿Qué método?
Coloca este método junto a sus parientes más cercanos y léelos lado a lado: la biblioteca pone los libros sobre la mesa; la elección es tuya.
- Actor-Network Theory AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ comparar
- Controversy MappingScience Technology Studies↔ comparar
- Digital MethodsScience Technology Studies↔ comparar
- Issue MappingScience Technology Studies↔ comparar
Citado por
Métodos similares
¿Has visto un problema en esta página? Infórmanos o sugiere una corrección →