Audit Experiment
An audit experiment, also called a correspondence or field audit study, sends matched but fictitious requests to real-world targets — such as legislators, landlords, or employers — while randomizing a single treatment cue, then compares the rate and quality of responses. In political science the canonical design follows Butler and Broockman's 2011 study of U.S. state legislators, which varied the putative race signaled by a constituent's name to measure discrimination in responsiveness.
Leer el método completo
Inicia sesión con una cuenta gratuita para leer esta sección.
Mapa de métodos
El vecindario de métodos relacionados: selecciona un nodo para explorarlo.
Fuentes
- Butler, D. M., & Broockman, D. E. (2011). Do Politicians Racially Discriminate Against Constituents? A Field Experiment on State Legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 463–477. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00515.x ↗
- Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination. American Economic Review, 94(4), 991–1013. DOI: 10.1257/0002828042002561 ↗
Cómo citar esta página
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Audit Experiment (Correspondence / Field Audit Study). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/es/political-science/audit-experiment
¿Qué método?
Coloca este método junto a sus parientes más cercanos y léelos lado a lado: la biblioteca pone los libros sobre la mesa; la elección es tuya.
- Experimento de CampoDiseño experimental↔ comparar
- Field Experiment in PoliticsPolitical Science↔ comparar
- List ExperimentPolitical Science↔ comparar
- Survey ExperimentPolitical Science↔ comparar
Citado por
Métodos similares
¿Has visto un problema en esta página? Infórmanos o sugiere una corrección →