Comparar métodos

	SPJ Framework	SAPROF
Campo	Psicología forense	Psicología forense
Familia	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Año de origen	2003	2012
Autor original	Stephen D. Hart, Peter R. Kropp, David R. Laws	Vivienne de Vogel, Corine de Ruiter, Yvonne Bouman, Merike de Vries Robbé
Tipo	Clinician-Synthesized	Clinician-rated
Fuente seminal	Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., & Laws, D. R. (Eds.). (2003). Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment, and treatment. Guilford Press.	de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2012). SAPROF: Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (Version 3). Forum Educatief.
Alias	SPJ, Structured Professional Judgment, SPJ Framework	SAPROF, de Vogel SAPROF
Relacionados	4	4
Resumen	The Structured Professional Judgment (SPJ) framework represents a contemporary approach to forensic risk assessment that synthesizes clinical judgment with empirical evidence of risk factors. Rather than producing a numerical score, SPJ guides clinicians through systematic evaluation of case-specific evidence to arrive at a structured, transparent categorical risk judgment. SPJ has become the preferred methodology in many forensic settings globally and underlies instruments such as the HCR-20v3 (violence risk) and sexual offender assessment protocols.	The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk (SAPROF) is a 17-item structured professional judgment tool developed by de Vogel, de Ruiter, Bouman, and colleagues (2012) to identify protective factors and strengths in individuals undergoing violence risk assessment. It complements risk assessment instruments (e.g., HCR-20v3) by systematically evaluating resilience, social support, motivation, and positive functioning—domains that mitigate violence risk and inform rehabilitation potential.